Whenever I come across the link on our state convention's website for pastor-less churches, I wonder with what frequency the same churches pop up advertising. As I read Zechariah 11, I was taken back in time to a church that really wanted only a preacher who would root up all the problems but in the end didn't much care for me. When you pasture a flock; trying to tend their needs, feed them, care for them... and the care you provide is basically thrown back in your face... I completely understand Zechariah's mindset (v.9-14) There are distinct reasons some churches continually appear in state papers looking for a pastor; it's largely because, they like addicts, are addicted more to the dysfunction that leads to the condition of a 'pastor-less church' than to the drug of their choice. The comfort level (or drug) for some congregations is 'conflict', 'disunity', 'self-centeredness', 'un-forgiveness' or whatever else you can imagine. Not much can be done in those churches except to break the staffs and leave them to their own devices. One of the biggest trends among Southern Baptists seminaries today is future ministers refusing to enter established churches, instead they are starting new churches. Which begs the question: which is easier, 'giving birth' or 'raising the dead'?
The job of the pastor / prophet is to lead and teach according to the Scriptures. My professional verse is: (Psalm 78:72) "David shepherded them with integrity of heart; with skillful hands he led them." I never want to be labeled a 'worthless shepherd'... I'd rather a church detest me for being faithful to God who cares for them than someone who deserts them, leaving them exposed to the elements.
At the same time, my hope and prayer for 'The Fellowship' of FBC-LA is to be receptive to God's Word and Spirit, and to never, ever return to its former ways. We have much to be thankful for, and one of those is a great church body. May God's 'favor' and 'union' be on us as we seek Him with all our hearts.